🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has a new medium, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and grammar: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and potential offenders loom up to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of vehicle beams or torches as the officers approach, their expressions and tones expressing wariness or fear or indignation or dubiously feigned naivety. And we frequently catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the police seemed surprisingly lenient with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, made exclusively of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose children allegedly harassed and tormented her white neighbour, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were repeatedly called, the accused fatally shot Owens through her locked door, when the victim went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Investigation and Legal Context

The arresting officers found evidence that the suspect had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow residents and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie builds its story with the officer recordings captured during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of the caller calling the police in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really imply anything too complex about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The film is presented as an illustration of how self-defense regulations lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the reality of firearm possession and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel surprised at how minimal concern the officers took in this point. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in recordings that were not included). Or is gun ownership so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what seemed to her local residents a extended period, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the handcuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Did the gentle handling up until that point encouraged her to think that this could be effective?

Conclusion and Verdict

It didn’t; and the panel's decision is revealed in the closing credits. A very sombre picture of U.S. justice and consequences.