Boom Time for American Billionaires: How the Economic Structure Perpetuates Income Disparity
For many Americans, the economic climate over the last half-decade has been difficult. Prices have soared while salaries remains unchanged. Steep mortgage rates have made buying a home a grim prospect. The rate of unemployment has been creeping up.
Many Americans have stated they're postponing major life decisions, including starting a family or switching jobs, because of financial volatility. But for a tiny fraction of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more successful.
Fortune Expansion
The wealth of the world's billionaires increased 54% in 2020, at the height of the pandemic. And even throughout all the market volatility, the stock market has only persisted in expanding. This increase has primarily advantaged just a tiny percentage of Americans: 10% of the population controls 93% of stock market wealth.
Despite the imbalance as this allocation seems, it's the financial structure working as it is presently configured.
"The wealthy have acquired their jets, they've purchased their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're buying senators and media outlets," stated wealth disparity expert Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality."
Mapping Economic Classes
To help others grasp what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins utilizes a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, envisioned the different levels of wealth as "Affluencia" villages: Wealth Borough, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To modernize the concept, Collins classifies these "wealth villages" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more exclusive as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
In total, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still traveling in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins explained. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no investment in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system fails – you're set."
Ultra-Wealth Impact
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's most affluent. The power that this group has far surpasses those who are simply affluent, let alone the average American who doesn't reside in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the political catchphrase "abolish billionaires" doesn't capture the real problem and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the separation between individual behaviors and a structure of regulations," Collins commented. "We should be worried about an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins divides it into four parts: getting the wealth, protecting assets, government influence and maximum resource extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think solely about the first step, Collins said. People can create a limited sum of wealth through establishing or managing a successful business, which could get them membership in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a extensive selection of tools such as legal entities, international accounts, undisclosed businesses, philanthropic entities and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to secure fortune and ensure continued growth.
The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to touch nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through investment firms, which allows wealthy individuals to fund private companies.
"Private equity is looking for those corners of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people realize is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can boost their expenses."
Tangible Effects
The results of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people paying more for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any meaningful wage increases. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to profound dissatisfaction.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being excluded [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that Republicans have been good at accessing a potent "false common-man appeal".
Policy Situation
The irony, Collins points out in his book, is that political leaders have appointed a succession of billionaires to administrative posts. Along with wealthy entrepreneurs who had temporary but significant roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other crucial appointments for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This political landscape, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass major tax legislation, which will make lasting reductions for the wealthy and corporations.
The Path Forward
While government groups continue to argue that foreign entry and poor economic deals are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the question becomes: Will the other major party, which has also been controlled by the billionaires and big money, be able to effectively tackle the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "reverse the updraft of wealth", including significant reforms to the tax system, increasing the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations.
"It was so, so close, and the bill really did represent the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these urgent problems," Collins said. "Elite control is not about building so much as stopping. It's easier to block than it is to make something significant occur, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is hopeful that there can be change, but said it would require sustained political momentum.
"It may be quickly that the balance shifts, and then it really is about maintaining a continuous public campaign to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is addressable."